Aug 23, 2016 13:00
7 yrs ago
4 viewers *
Dutch term

opzet

Non-PRO Dutch to English Law/Patents Law (general) in a Mandate and general terms and conditions
Uit een "Mandaat en algemene voorwaarden" van een Belgisch advocatenkantoor:

"Aansprakelijkheid. De cliënt aanvaardt dat de vergoeding van de schade die hij/zij lijdt door een beroepsfout van het advocatenkantoor beperkt wordt tot het bedrag waarvoor het advocatenkantoor verzekerd is, meer bepaald tot xxx € per schadegeval per jaar. Deze beperking is niet van toepassing in geval van opzet."

opzet (De Valks jur. woordenboek):
modaliteit van het moreel bestanddeel van het misdrijf bestaande in het wetens en willens doen wat door de strafwet verboden is of nalaten wat de strafwet gebiedt.

intent, intention, intentional act, mens rea, fraud,...?
Can you help me on deciding which is the right term to use here? I would go for "intention" but am not sure; "fraud" sounds much better in the sentence but am not sure it isn't too narrow a term to be used for "opzet".

TIA for your suggestions.
Proposed translations (English)
4 intentional harm
Change log

Aug 23, 2016 13:06: writeaway changed "Language pair" from "Flemish to English" to "Dutch to English" , "Field (write-in)" from "Mandate and general terms and conditions" to "in a Mandate and general terms and conditions"

Aug 23, 2016 20:19: sindy cremer changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"

Votes to reclassify question as PRO/non-PRO:

Non-PRO (3): writeaway, Textpertise, sindy cremer

When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.

How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:

An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)

A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).

Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.

When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.

* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.

Proposed translations

51 mins

intentional harm

This limitation does not apply in the event of intentional harm.
(Does not include gross negligence.)

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 53 mins (2016-08-23 13:53:27 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

---
What are Intentional Torts? - FindLaw
injury.findlaw.com › ... › Accidents and Injuries › Torts and Personal Injuries
A "tort" is some kind of wrongful act that causes harm to someone else. ... In that case, the actor intended to make a fist and slam it into his victims face, and ... However, the person who performs an intentional tort need not intend the harm. ... Product Liability, Torts and Personal Injuries, Assault, Battery and Intentional Torts ...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 days (2016-08-30 12:15:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

("Wilful misconduct" is highly unidiomatic.)

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 8 days (2016-08-31 18:20:43 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

(You must be right. I get zero hits on Google for "ignorant unidiomatic legal".)
Note from asker:
Thanks for your answer. I chose to use 'wilful misconduct' in the end.
(Interesting. I get 204 000 hits on google for 'wilful misconduct'.)
Something went wrong...

Reference comments

4 mins
Reference:

take your pic.

opzet (Jurlex)

intent , deliberate intent , intentional act or omission , wilful act
Note from asker:
Thank you, writeaway
Peer comments on this reference comment:

agree Michael Beijer
6 mins
agree Kitty Brussaard : This term often appears together with 'grove schuld' (as in: opzet of grove schuld > wilful misconduct or gross neglicence).
18 mins
It's an everyday term basically. That's why I voted it non-pro. It shouldn't be presenting a problem.
agree Tina Vonhof (X)
1 hr
Something went wrong...
10 mins
Reference:

refs

Le Docte (new online version):

opzet (1) de [Europees recht]
FR: structure f; économie f
EN: structure
DE: Organisation m; Planung f

opzet (2) het [handels- en economisch recht]
FR: fait m
EN: wilful act
DE: Handlung f

opzet (3) het [burgerlijk recht]
FR: faute (f) intentionnelle; dol m
EN: intentional act; malice
DE: Vorsatz m; Absicht f

opzet (4) het [België] [strafrecht]
FR: intention f; intention (f) délictueuse
EN: intention; purpose
DE: wissentliches Handeln; Absicht f; Vorbedacht m

FELOnline:

opzet =
intentional act or omission
wilful misconduct
Note from asker:
Thank you, Michael. I chose 'wilful misconduct' in the end - that seemed to fit the context best.
Peer comments on this reference comment:

agree Kitty Brussaard : Often occurs in the phrase 'opzet of grove schuld' > 'wilful misconduct or gross negligence'
5 mins
agree Willemina Hagenauw : Yep, willful act seems to cover it
7 mins
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search