My take on it...

Propozycja

A different take on it. There are such terms as addressibility in literary texts.
One particular meaning refers to different level of abstraction:

What distinguishes this text object from others? I would argue that a text is a text because it is massively addressable at different levels of scale. Addressable here means that one can query a position within the text at a certain level of abstraction. In an earlier post, for example, I argued that a text might be thought of as a vector through a meta-table of all possible words. Why is it possible to think of a text in this fashion? Because a text can be queried at the level of single words and then related to other texts at the same level of abstraction: the table of all possible words could be defined as the aggregate of points of address at a given level of abstraction (the word, as in Google’s new n-gram corpus). Now, we are discussing ideal objects here: addressability implies different levels of abstraction (character, word, phrase, line, etc) which are stipulative or nominal: such levels are not material properties of texts or Pythagorean ideals; they are, rather, conventions.
http://winedarksea.org/?p=926

the way it addresses different audiences
the way it addresses different audiences and contexts
“to address different audiences and contexts” https://canvas.uw.edu/eportfolios/33568/Home/Outcome_1

the fact that it targets a multiplicity of readers
“to target a multiplicity of readers” https://canvas.uw.edu/eportfolios/33568/Home/Outcome_1

its multiplicity of address
“the multiplicity of address that these authors use” “this multiplicity of address” http://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?articl...
“Children’s literature also points to the multiplicity of address of literature” https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0814758541
https://www.amazon.com/Keywords-Childrens-Literature-Philip-...